IAOC Meeting 2013-04-18 10:00 EDT


Jari Arkko [PRESENT]
Scott Bradner [PRESENT]
Randy Bush [PRESENT]
Chris Griffiths [PRESENT]
Bob Hinden [PRESENT, Chair]
Russ Housley [PRESENT]
Ole Jacobsen [PRESENT]
Ray Pelletier [PRESENT, IAD]
Lynn St. Amour [PRESENT]

Bernard Aboba [GUEST]
Jewellee Dalrymple [SCRIBE]


IAOC Meeting Agenda

===================

1. Minutes

2013-03-13
2013-04-04
2. RPS Udate
3. DPM Appointment
4. Tools Maintenance Contract
5. Contracts Status 2013
6. Legal Services Contract Extension
7. Orlando Financial Results
8. Berlin Registration Gender Collection
9. IANA SLA
10. Retreat Logistics and Agenda
11. AOB

Bob called the meeting to order at 10:02 AM EDT.

1. Minutes
========
The 2013-03-13 minutes have not yet been produced.  The 2013-04-04 minutes are ready for adoption. There were no modifications to the 2013-04-04 minutes.

Bob moved, and Chris seconded a motion to approve the 2013-
04-04 minutes. Scott abstained from the vote because he had not been present for the meeting.

Without objection, the minutes were approved.

2. RPS Update
==========================================
Bernard gave an update on the status of the Remote Participation Services initiative.

The proposed RPS objectives are (i) to enhance the Remote Participation experience in a variety of scenarios; (ii) to broaden the potential base of IETF participants; (iii) to deploy and gain experience with the use of IETF & W3C technology; and (iv) to enlist the IETF community in the development of services to meet their needs.

Some desirable capabilities as a participant: to be able to see and hear any of the WB/BOF meetings and plenaries, either in real-time or after the meeting; as a presenter: to be able to make a presentation (with face visible), show slides, and hear and answer questions from the floor and from other remote participants.

As much as possible the protocols and the software should be non-proprietary, and must be usable on a wide range of PC and mobile platforms.

Responses expressing interest for Meetecho, Cisco WebEx, and Jitsi.

There was feedback received at IETF 86 that the community wants a lot more remote participation such as enhanced audio/video. There was substantial positive feedback on Meetecho and they appreciated the archival sessions of the IETF website and the tutorials. The time from live to archive is critical. People basically want everything to be covered. One person has to be present so there is a possible issue with that; but the desire to cover every meeting is there.

One hour has set aside at the retreat, and there’s a tentative schedule. During that hour there will be a discussion of details on the RPS committee. Also discussed will be the technology roadmap and compliance requirements.

Would want to make an announcement to the community that this activity is going on – that being the outcome of the retreat session. Web RTC is a strong direction the IAOC likes. A lot of developer support is needed; it’s hard to move forward without it.

3. DPM Appointment
==============
Ray reports that Henrik's tenure as Datatracker PM has expired with a one-year extension still available. However, Henrik does not desire reappointment.  Robert Sparks is willing to serve as DPM in a Volunteer capacity.

Robert is uniquely qualified through his tools experience, Code Sprint experience, service on the Tools Development Committee, service as an AD with hands-on experience with the Datatracker, and work with Henrik over the years, as well as having Henrik's trust and confidence. Henrik recommends Robert to become the next DPM. The Tools Management Committee also recommends the IAOC appoint Robert as the DPM.

Scott moved and Russ seconded a motion for the IAOC to appoint Robert Sparks Datatracker Project Manager and requests the Internet Society to enter into such agreements to effect this appointment.

Jari Arkko [YES]
Scott Bradner [YES]
Randy Bush [YES]
Chris Griffiths [YES]
Bob Hinden [YES]
Russ Housley [YES]
Ole Jacobsen [YES]
Lynn St. Amour [YES]

The motion passed.

4. Tools Maintenance Contract
======================
Ray presented the background for awarding a tools maintenance contract to Henrik.

Tools Maintenance includes:

  1. coding and design needed to close bug and enhancement request issues in the issue trackers
  2. code and user-interface cleanup and refactoring work
  3. code merge
  4. testing and release management for code from consultants and volunteers
  5. code changes and testing needed for platform upgrades, and
  6. other coding and design work that doesn't warrant RFPs, on request from the IAOC

More than $600K has been spent on Datatracker and Tools development since 2010.  Tools not under warranty need to be maintained.  The tools maintenance Budget for 2013 is $75K.

The Tools Management Committee is recommending that Henrik be awarded a Tools Maintenance contract.

Henrik's employer, Netnod, currently donates 25% of the Henrik's time during regular work hours to working on tools maintenance.

This award and compensation would be for tools maintenance performed on personal time expended each week.

The compensation for such work shall be <confidential> </confidential>

There may also be some travel requirements, but, as yet, unknown. Ray and the Tools Management Committee will monitor the contract.

RESOLUTION:
The IAOC approves the award of a Tools Maintenance Contract to Henrik Levkowetz and requests the Internet Society to enter into such agreements to effect this award.

Scott moved and Russ seconded a motion to approve the award of a Tools Maintenance Contract to Henrik Levkowetz and request that the Internet Society to enter into such agreements to effect this award.

Jari Arkko [YES]
Scott Bradner [YES]
Randy Bush [YES]
Chris Griffiths [YES]
Bob Hinden [YES]
Russ Housley [YES]
Ole Jacobsen [YES]
Lynn St. Amour [YES]

The motion passed.

5. Contracts Status 2013
===================
Ray reported on the status of contracts up for RFP or extension in 2013.

1.  Secretariat expires 31 Jan 14
2.  RFC Publisher expires 31 Jan 14
3.  RFC Production Center expires 31 Dec 13
4.  RFC Series Editor expires 31 Dec 13
5.  Legal Services expires 30 June 13

All are eligible for a 2-year extension.

The 2013 Budget set a Transitions Budget of $0 based on the assumption that there would be no change in contractors in 2013. There was the presumption that each contract would be extended. This was discussed when the IAOC adopted the 2013 Budget in September 2012.

If we did want to issue an RFP we would target the following dates:

1.  Secretariat June 2013
2.  RFC Publisher (par of current Secretariat contract) June 2013
3.  RFC Production Center June 2013
4.  RFC Series Editor June 2013
5.  Legal Services May 2013

All RFC Editor (2-4) extensions and RFPs require approval of RSOC and/or IAB.

Recommend all be extended for 2 years effective on the anniversary of their effective date; however, the IAOC needs to discuss II-IV above with RSOC and IAB before proceeding.

Except for Legal Services we will take action on these beginning in May.

6. Legal Services Contract Extension
======================
The current legal services contract with Contreras Legal Strategy LLC expires on 30 June 2013.  The contract provides for two renewal terms of 2 years each.  Contreras has been legal counsel to the IETF since 1998. There is no change in the compensation arrangement.  The Legal Management Committee recommends the contract extension.

This would be the first of two possible extensions. Jorge is providing very good service. The compensation arrangement is a fixed monthly retainer. There will be no change in that area over the next two years. There are some legal fees that are paid to the other lawyers, for subpoena work, depositions, litigation and others that Contreras Legal Strategy does not provide.

RESOLUTION:
The IAOC approves a two-year extension of the Legal Services Contract with Contreras Legal Strategy LLC and requests the Internet Society to enter into such agreements as to effect this extension.

Scott moved and Russ seconded a motion to approve a two- year extension of the Legal Services Contract with Contreras Legal Strategy LLC and request that the Internet Society enter into such agreement as to effect this extension.

Jari Arkko [YES]
Scott Bradner [YES]
Randy Bush [ABSTAIN]
Chris Griffiths [YES]
Bob Hinden [YES]
Russ Housley [YES]
Ole Jacobsen [YES]
Lynn St. Amour [YES]

The motion passed. Randy abstained because he had not seen the contract.

7. Orlando Financial Results
=====================
Ray reported on the financial results of the IETF 86 meeting in Orlando.

Revenues were $31.5K less than forecast, while Expenses did better than forecast by $57K.  Net Funds Available for IETF Operations were $483,535, $25K better than forecast.

Revenue results of note:
1.  Registration       -$33K
67 fewer paid attendees than forecasted
2.  Sponsorship       -$30K
No Welcome Reception sponsor
3.  Hotel Commissions -$6k
4.  New Revenue       +$20K
includes Bits-N-Bites sponsor revenues
5.  Total Revenues:   $991,550

Expense results of Note:
1.  Network costs     $39K below budget
2.  Food & Beverage $18K below budget
3.  Miscellaneous exp $17K below budget
4.  Shuttle services  $20K NOT budgeted
5.  Total Expenses:   $538,015

Bits-N-Bites Program results:

  Actual Budget

Target

Revenues: $45K $0 $65K
Expenses: $31K $40K  

The bus service averaged about 100 people per night – it was under utilized. The survey response indicated people used taxis and many people had more rental cars than normal. It would have been worse had buses not have been provided at all.

8. Berlin Registration Gender Data Collection
=================================
A member of the community requested that Gender data be collected via the IETF Meeting Registration form "because of the volume of discussion amongst IETF women about what fraction of participants we constitute". Ray reported that last year, in September, a member of the community asked if the IAOC could include gender data on the registration form. It was too late then for Atlanta but it’s come up again for Berlin.

The IAOC asked the community for feedback on the proposal for an Optional Question to identify registrant's gender.

There was a lengthy discussion on the list and email sent directly to the IAOC.  Feedback included that it was OK, that we needed a professional to frame the questions, that the question itself was repugnant, that it may violate privacy regulation and much more.

Ray said one option would be to send this matter to the Design Team, that the data was just one part of an overall Diversity question that the IETF is pursuing through a Design Team established by the IETF Chair. The Design Team will be engaging in a lengthy dialogue with the community to reach its recommendations.

The IAOC engaged in a discussion of the pros, cons, and legality of collecting gender data, as well as its retention.

The IAOC has to be clear about what they’re going to do with the data. The aggregate is the only data that should be kept. The IAOC has enough guidance that that’s okay to do, but the IAOC has to be very clear on how we’re going to keep the data.

Ray noted that AMS needed a Go-No Go by 25 April in order to get the development work done in time registration to open the week of 29 April.

RESOLUTION:
The IAOC approves the collection of Gender data on the
Meeting registration form provided the question is optional, the individual data is not made public and not retained, the results are reported in the aggregate, and the registration form states why the information is being gathered. The data is being gathered to benchmark gender participation currently, over time, regionally, and inform IETF diversity initiatives, if any.

Scott moved and Ole seconded a motion to approve the collection of Gender data on the Meeting registration form provided the question is optional, the individual data is not made public and not retained, the results are reported in the aggregate, and the registration form states why the information is being gathered. The data is being gathered to benchmark gender participation currently, over time, regionally, and inform IETF diversity initiatives, if any.

Jari Arkko [YES]
Scott Bradner [YES]
Randy Bush [YES]
Chris Griffiths [ABSTAIN]
Bob Hinden [YES]
Russ Housley [YES]
Ole Jacobsen [YES]
Lynn St. Amour [YES]

The motion passed. Chris abstained because he felt that the IAOC needed to finish the discussion on messaging for gender information gathering before they voted on doing it

9. IANA SLA
==========
The IANA SLA is still undergoing review at IANA.

10. Retreat Logistics and Agenda
========================
Retreat is scheduled 9:00 AM-5:00 PM Monday and Tuesday, 29 - 30 April.  A hot breakfast buffet will be available beginning 8:00 AM in the meeting space.  A lunch buffet will be 12:00-1:00, Monday and Tuesday in the meeting space.

The dinner schedule is:
    Sunday informal 7:00 PM location TBD
    Monday          6:00 PM location TBD
    Tuesday          not scheduled

There will be breakout topic opportunities:
    Monday          4:00 - 5:00
    Tuesday         3:00 - 5:00

The agenda for the IAOC retreat was discussed in detail. More than an hour should be given to the RPS discussion.

11. AOB
======
No additional business was discussed.

Bob adjourned the IAOC meeting at 11:07 AM EDT.